I need to make a ruling as our fantasy league's commissioner and half the league will hate me either way.

By @finnok2 · Sports

We're in a long-running, pretty serious keeper league with a constitution. One manager found a clever loophole in our keeper rules to get an elite player for cheap, and now everyone is arguing about whether it's a brilliant move or just cheating.

The full story

I've been the commissioner for our 12-team fantasy football league for eight years. We take it seriously—there's real money on the line, and we have a detailed constitution that we amend and vote on every offseason. I try to be fair and run things by the book. The relevant rule is about our keepers. You can keep up to three players, and the cost is the draft round you originally selected them in. So, if you keep a player you got in the 5th round, you give up your 5th-round pick in the upcoming draft. A key detail is that players acquired via waivers have a default keeper cost of an 8th-round pick. Now for the problem. One manager had a top-5 running back that he drafted in the 1st round last year. He wants to keep him, obviously, but he doesn't want it to cost him another 1st-round pick. So, two weeks ago, he traded this star player to a manager who is in a full rebuild and has no chance of competing this year. Then, this past weekend, the rebuilding manager conveniently dropped that same star player. The original manager, who had the #1 waiver priority, immediately claimed him. So now, by the letter of our rules, he re-acquired this player from waivers, meaning his keeper cost is just an 8th-round pick instead of a 1st. He essentially 'laundered' the player's keeper cost through a non-competing team. The league is completely split. Half the managers are calling him a genius, saying it's his right to exploit a poorly written rule. The other half is screaming collusion and saying it's a cheap move that goes against the spirit of the game. The manager who helped him is just playing dumb, saying he made a bad trade and then changed his mind about the player. As commissioner, the final decision is mine. Our rules don't explicitly forbid this maneuver. If I allow it, I’m following the constitution as written, but it sets a terrible precedent that could ruin the league. If I veto the move and restore the player's 1st-round keeper cost, I'm essentially creating a rule after the fact and overruling a manager's autonomy. What's the right call?

How people voted

Readers are split: “Depends” leads with 41% — 206 votes and 5 comments so far.

What people are saying

Keep reading

Vote now on BeSoForeal