I'm in charge of digitizing 20 years of our family's home videos and I'm not sure it's a good idea.

By @gusfr · Nostalgia

My wife wants to convert our massive box of old VHS and Hi8 tapes to digital files to 'preserve the memories.' I'm looking at the cost and the time commitment and wondering if some things are better left as fuzzy memories instead of high-res files.

The full story

We have a giant storage tub in the attic with at least 50 tapes from the late 80s through the early 2000s—a whole museum of dead media formats. My wife's logic is sound on the surface: preserve our family history, make it easy to share with our kids and relatives, and save them before the magnetic tape degrades to dust. The problem is the execution. Mail-in services charge around $25 per tape. For our collection, we're looking at a bill of over $1,200. The alternative is I buy a VCR and a digital capture card and do it myself. That option saves money but costs me dozens, if not hundreds, of hours capturing footage and editing out the hours where my dad forgot to stop recording and filmed the carpet. Here’s the core of my hesitation: are the actual videos worth the effort? I have this perfect memory of my 6th birthday, a classic 90s backyard party. On tape, is it a 2-hour epic with 10 minutes of cake and 110 minutes of shaky shots of the lawn and my uncle telling bad jokes? I’m concerned that converting these memories to crystal-clear digital files will just ruin the nostalgia. The 'idea' of these memories might be more valuable than the boring reality on the tapes. My wife says I'm being too cynical and that when the tapes are finally unplayable, I'll regret not acting. She has a point. But I can't shake the feeling this is a massive, expensive project to just confirm that most of our home movies were actually pretty boring. I need a logical path forward.

How people voted

Readers are split: “Depends” leads with 39% — 135 votes and 5 comments so far.

What people are saying

Keep reading

Vote now on BeSoForeal